A few days ago, I was having dinner with friends in West Seattle. One of my friends had a sister who had happened to appear on the Jenny Jones show (remember her?) back in the day. Her sister was on a makeover program called something like, "Don't Mean to Be Rude, But You Look Like a Dude" and featured makeovers of women who dressed like men or who were otherwise masculine in appearance. I won't even go into the political correctness of the show's topic, but the reason I'm bringing it up now is something my friend remembered about her sister's appearance on the show: they were very, very careful about not mentioning anything at all about most of the guests being lesbian, and any mention of homosexuality, period, was edited out of the final show.
We all knew why Jones and her staff tiptoed around the love that dared not speak its name. If you recall, the Jenny Jones show was sued years ago and made nationwide headlines when Ms. Jones did a show on secret crushes and a young man announced his crush on another young man, Jonathan Schmitz. Schmitz was not flattered, in fact he shot and killed his not-so-secret admirer.
Which brings us to gay panic, a term that could have been used by defense attorneys in this case.
RR: For those of us who don't know, why don't you start off by defining the term "gay panic."
DM: People familiar with the term know it as a defense strategy in murder and assault cases. A straight guy will claim he just freaked out when some gay guy came on to him. It's probably been a winking legal strategy for ages, for as long as homosexuality has been considered sinister and predatory. It also involves a boys-will-be-boys tolerance for violence on the part of presumably virtuous young men. More often than not the defense is a sham. Lawyers use it to disguise prostitution on the one hand and hate crimes on the other. It was explicitly disallowed in the Matthew Shepard murder trial, for instance. In a broader sense "Gay Panic" can refer to a whole spectrum of psychological responses experienced by straight men (or men who want or need desperately to be straight) when they find themselves in a sexual situation with another man (or a situation they perceive as sexual).
RR: What inspired you to write a book about this topic?
DM: It was a subject that was all over the news and in the air, but it hadn't been looked at closely in the way only a writer is able to do. The reporting that existed on the subject was wildly inaccurate, in part because TV and newspapers are simply not frank when it comes to sex ("...claims the victim acted suggestively." What exactly does that mean?) In equal part, I think, the inaccuracy stems from the way the gay community politicizes these cases. I'm gay myself, but I just wanted to tell the stories. I don't know what it says about me, but I found I'm able to look at this material with a pretty cold eye. Paradoxically, that's how you achieve an authentically humane treatment. I'm basically a fiction writer, so I report the story in the most artistic way I can. I think the moral and political conclusions are obvious enough that readers don't have to be led by the nose.
RR: How did you decide whom to include in the book?
DM: It's been really hard. I've stuck with American murder cases of the recent past. The earliest is '95, the latest, last year. Because I go into incredible depth and detail I think I'll only have room for five or six in the end. I hoped to get a snapshot of the entire country, so I picked cases from all over. I didn't want to be limited by any strict definition of "Gay Panic." What I was really interested in was anything that illuminated a violent clash of "straight culture" and "gay culture." One of my stories isn't a true "gay panic" case at all, more like a calculated gay assassination. Ideally, I wanted something that would be fascinating for young straight guys to read, but I think it's too soon to expect many of them even to dare picking up a book with "gay" in the title. We're getting there, though. The reason I was thinking about straight guys is that "gay panic" is something that takes place in their minds. I want them and everyone to think about it. I started out with the common assumption that most of these killers were probably gay deep down and just couldn't deal with it. Who else would get so upset? Curiously enough, cases like that seem to be rare. Only one of the murderers I write about turned out to be gay, and though he kidded himself, he wasn't actually unaware of it. He led simultaneous lives in gay porn, hustling and rabidly anti-gay skinhead gang activity. Turning tricks by day, gay-bashing by night. But every other killer really is or was straight. Ultimately, "straight culture" and "gay culture" just exist our heads. I wanted to tell these stories for everybody.
RR: We hear a lot these days about gay hate crimes. How does gay panic fit in with the current dialogue?
DM: They're the same thing. "Gay Panic" is just a hate crime where you believe or claim you started out as a victim. That said, I'm not much of a political thinker. I imagine myself as more like the artist whose highest duty is as a researcher for the culture as a whole. Others can argue and interpret the "evidence" the artist comes up with.
RR: What measures do you think could have been taken to prevent these instances of gay panic?
RR: What measures do you think could have been taken to prevent these instances of gay panic?
DM: What I've been doing is harrowing in a way, re-imagining these crimes in great detail. I'm not at all experienced with "True Crime" writing and I've approached the whole thing as a student and with a huge sense of responsibility. One thing that strikes me as I write is that I keep experiencing a very human response to disaster: after the fact, it feels both absurdly contingent--unlikely, even--at the same time it feels inevitable. Politically, socially there may have been things to do to prevent these crimes, but I've been looking at them as human dramas. In a perfect world there'd be no crime at all and no one would ever be hurt.
RR: What can we, as a society, do to lessen the occurrence of instances of gay panic in the future?
DM: As a legal defense "gay panic" is probably on the way out. Judges and juries don't have much patience for it anymore. Look at the judge's decision in the Shepard case. On the other hand it's incredibly prevalent overseas still. As a phenomenon I'm not sure how much we can do about it. The hopeful answer is to be honest and explicit about the crimes themselves, exactly what I'm trying to do in the book. A darker view is that there's nothing to do. Even if the whole notion of "gay panic" could be taken out of the equation (say, in a world without prejudice), maybe these crimes would occur in exactly the same way and simply be called something different. Almost all crime is attributable to young men. When you take away the lurid sexual content, these crimes are the quintessential crimes of a young man's identity: his honor, self-respect, pride, self-image. It's hard to imagine preventing them without changing the nature of manhood.
RR: Tell the nice people where they can buy your book.
DM: It's appearing later this year from Alyson Books. It should be available everywhere.
Thank you, David. For more on David and the book, visit his website. You can preorder David's book from Amazon here.
[Photo of the author by Everett McCourt]
Wow, I have to say beyond that Jenny Jones case I've never really heard about this, but living in Canada, maybe we don't hear it so much.
ReplyDeleteI'd be curious if a man asked a lesbian woman on a date and she killed him could she claim "straight panic"? With these kind of weird claims every time you turn it around you suddenly realize how utterly stupid the concept is.
Sounds like an interesting topic for a book. Good luck when it comes out.
This is a subject that has hit close to home for me. I can't wait to read this book. Excellent interview.
ReplyDelete